What is content automation?
Content automation is software that takes the repeated parts of publishing off a person: finding and reading sources, writing a draft, checking it against those sources, attaching an image, and putting it on the site on a schedule. The work still happens. Nobody has to sit and do it every time.
It is not the same as an AI writer, which waits for a prompt and returns one draft while you keep the research, the checking and the publishing. It is not content marketing automation either, which schedules and distributes writing that already exists.
The question is not how much you can automate. It is which half.
Automated content generation gets a bad name from tools that automated the writing and left out the research and the checking. That is the expensive half to do by hand and the cheap half to fake, which is exactly why so much of it is faked. Here is where the line sits.
Finding and reading the sources
Research runs by default, at the time of writing, and every source it reads is cited inline. This is the part that is genuinely tedious and genuinely mechanical.
The first full draft
One line in, one article out. A topic, a list, a brief or a URL, in the voice and reading level the publication has set.
Checking the draft against its own sources
Each claim is checked against the sources the article itself used. What could not be put right is named on the article in amber rather than hidden behind a green tick.
The picture, and the disclosure
An on-topic image per article, and the EU AI Act Article 50 disclosure where one is owed.
Putting it on the site, on time
Your topics, your times, per site. Seven CMS platforms, or Markdown and HTML if you would rather take it away.
Deciding a topic is worth covering
You set the sections a publication covers. It finds the stories inside them. Which subjects a title owns is an editorial judgement and stays yours.
Writing something it cannot source
A topic it cannot find real pages for is not written. An empty article is a better outcome than a confident one with nothing behind it.
Hiding what it could not check
Some things a check cannot settle. Those are named on the article as not recorded, in the customer's own words, rather than quietly passed.
Being nobody's responsibility
Every article carries a named byline, and a publication set to publish unattended names an editor of record. Automation does not remove the person accountable for what went out.
Automation is a setting here, not the product.
Mastheads is source-backed article writing with nine editorial desks behind it. Content automation is one of the ways you can run it: set the sections a publication covers, set the times, and articles arrive written, checked, illustrated and ready. Most people leave review switched on and read them first. That is the default, and turning it off is a decision you make per publication, with a named editor of record attached to it.
Used the other way, it is not automated at all: ask for one article in one line and read it when it lands. The same desks run either way. AI content automation and content generation services are two shapes of the same engine, and you are not asked to choose a mode before you start.
Questions people ask first
What is content automation?
Content automation is software that takes the repeated parts of publishing off a person: finding and reading sources, writing a draft, checking it against those sources, attaching an image, and putting it on the site on a schedule. The work still happens. Nobody has to sit and do it each time.
How is it different from an AI writer?
An AI writer waits for a prompt and returns one draft. You are still the one who researches it, checks it, finds a picture, opens the CMS and presses publish. Content automation covers the whole of that, which is why automated content generation and content publishing automation are usually talked about together.
Is content automation the same as content marketing automation?
No. Content marketing automation schedules and distributes content somebody has already written - emails, posts, sequences. Content automation is about the writing and publishing themselves. A team can want one and not the other.
What should content automation never do?
Write something it could not source, and hide what it could not check. Those are the two failures that make automated content a liability rather than a saving. A tool that cannot tell you where a sentence came from has automated the wrong half of the job.
Does automated content rank?
Google's guidance is about whether content is helpful and original, not about how it was produced. What sinks automated content in practice is that it is thin, unsourced and says nothing a reader could not get elsewhere. Content automation and SEO only agree when the automation is doing real research.
Can I keep a person in the loop?
Yes, and that is the default here. Articles are written and then wait for you to review them. Unattended publishing is something you switch on per publication, and a publication set that way names an editor of record who is accountable for it.
Which platforms can it publish to?
Seven: WordPress.org, WordPress.com, Ghost, Webflow, Shopify, HubSpot and GoHighLevel. You can also connect nothing at all and export as Markdown or HTML, which is a complete way to use it.
Does it work in languages other than English?
Yes. Articles are written natively in the language you set, rather than written in English and translated afterwards, so the press style of that language applies to the article itself.
Try it on one article first.
Ask for something in one line and read what comes back, sources and all. Nothing is scheduled until you say so.
Start free