Editor-in-Chief
The Editor-in-Chief gives every article a fresh final editorial read.
- IEditorial Director
- IISource Desk
- IIIPlanning Desk
- IVWriters Desk
- VFact Desk
- VIQA Desk
- VIIIStandards Desk
- IXArt Desk
- XProduction Desk
The Editor-in-Chief receives the article from the QA Desk and hands it to the Standards Desk.
The Editor-in-Chief is the Mastheads editorial desk that gives an article its final read and asks one question: would a reader finish it and return tomorrow? It reads once, with fresh eyes, and does not inherit another desk's verdict.
The Editor-in-Chief is the checking desk that rewrites. It strengthens a flat opening, tightens a loose close, untangles crowded sentences and restores the publication's voice. Without this pass, the facts could be sound while the article stays hard to read or not worth finishing. Every rewrite stays within the facts already established.
One desk, one job. Nothing inside it is split into roles.
The Editor-in-Chief takes in the article, the research record and your choices for tone, persona, opening, close, reading level and format. It is also shown any paragraph that is harder to read than intended, any needlessly repeated figure and any note addressed to the writer instead of the reader. It reads once with fresh eyes, without inheriting another desk's verdict.
The Editor-in-Chief hands the Standards Desk the revised article and an editorial verdict. Every name, figure, date and quotation used in a rewrite already appears in the article or research record. Source names, links and sourced figures remain. Any claim of first-hand testing or personal opinion introduced during a rewrite is removed, and the headline and headings stay as set. If the desk approves, the article may publish automatically. If it does not, the article waits for a person with the reason beside it, and anything beyond the paragraphs that still needs attention is recorded for review.
5 things it holds to, on every article it touches.
Facts stay faithful to the research.
Every name, figure, date and quotation used in a rewrite already appears in the article or research record.
Sources stay credited.
Source names, links and sourced figures survive the rewrite.
The article stays reporting.
Any claim of first-hand testing or personal opinion introduced in a rewritten paragraph is removed.
Headlines and headings stay set.
The desk works on paragraphs and leaves your headline and headings unchanged.
The Editor-in-Chief makes one complete pass.
Anything beyond the paragraphs that still needs attention is recorded for a person to review.
A paragraph contains three long sentences with several ideas in each. The Editor-in-Chief turns them into shorter sentences, one idea at a time, and keeps every name, figure and link. The reader gets the same facts with less effort.
The revised paragraphs carry the same established facts, source names, links and sourced figures in clearer writing. If the desk does not approve the article, it waits for a person with the reason beside it, and anything else that needs attention is recorded for review.
What people ask about the Editor-in-Chief.
What is the Editor-in-Chief in Mastheads?
What happens during the final read?
Does the Editor-in-Chief rewrite the article or only check it?
How does the Editor-in-Chief improve readability?
Can the Editor-in-Chief change facts or add new ones?
Does the Editor-in-Chief keep my sources and links?
Can the Editor-in-Chief change the headline or headings?
Which settings guide the Editor-in-Chief's rewrite?
Does the Editor-in-Chief add personal opinion or first-hand testing?
Where does the Editor-in-Chief sit among the Mastheads desks?
Does every Mastheads article get an Editor-in-Chief read?
What happens if the Editor-in-Chief does not approve an article?
Ten editorial desks,
on your next article.
7 days, 10 articles, no card. Every article shows its work.